Back to Steinman for Governor.
Steinman for Governor:

Part 009, Education:

By William E. Steinman:

November 16, 2006:

 

In the fourth issue in my list I said, in conjunction with the crime issue, we must spend whatever it takes to educate our kids. I also said ignorance is the largest single cause of crime in America. In fact, I have made that point several times. Although education is the focus of this essay, I must point out education begins in the home. The before school first four or five years of a kid’s life are the truly formative years. Much of the damage kids sustain is perpetrated in the home by the parents or guardians before the teachers ever see them.

 

So, let’s begin in the home with the father. All kids need a strong person in their life. They need a rock. They need someone who can say no and mean it. They need someone who will be tough and firm, but also dependable. They may say I hate you, but they will be secretly glad the rock is there, a rock they cannot move that will be there every day, no matter what! They need a real full time father. A father who abandons or betrays his kids is a floating turd. He belongs in a Paris sewer.

 

Along with this, I must look honestly at the so-called liberated people who believe they can birth and raise a child by themselves. This is another case of a missing father, by choice of the mother. It’s crap and we all know it. A kid needs a complete family to feel that he is normal. Without that, the kid will be sort changed on too many things and he will know it. He will feel different in a negative way. I don’t think we can legally do anything about this, but it’s wrong and we should actively discourage that life style. I am not saying this on some phony religious grounds, but on the real needs of the children. A kid needs a family to have the sense of completeness necessary to mental health.

 

I believe the most important element in the degeneration of our culture may well be the missing father. Although this problem knows no racial boundaries we must acknowledge that Blacks and Hispanics are the two ethnic groups who are the most likely to create this problem in their communities. So, the inner cities are where the missing father problem has its largest impact. The burden then falls very unjustly on the mother or even on the grandmother.

 

For sure, we are talking about a cyclic pattern that continues from generation to generation. Kids grow up without a father. They are reared in a situation where poverty and despair are considered to be the norm. They are cared for, if at all, by a struggling woman who has no resources and no help. They have little hope for a good life. Their options are limited to being lucky in sports or pushing drugs. Being lucky in sports is less likely than hitting the power ball lotto. The drug trade beckons every day.

 

Finally, the kid gets to his peak hormone level and begins impregnating women. He feels no more responsibility for the issue of his loins than an animal in the wild. The kids along with the mother are quickly abandon and forgotten. And the cycle continues. The wheel of pain and suffering rolls slowly onward crushing one generation after another. Each generation we get more school dropouts and the level of ignorance continues to rise. Crime continues to rise in proportion. The most important thing we can do in pre-education is to interrupt that cycle.

 

To interrupt this cycle, I will propose a cooperative venture between the Michigan cities with intercity problems and the state government. Cities that come easily to mind are Lansing, Detroit, Pontiac, and Flint. I’m sure there are several other cities that would make this list. The idea is not to point fingers, but to resolve problems. The plan is to give the preschool kids a day-by-day environment of positive support with opportunities to learn in a safe environment. The state would provide seed money for these programs, but the cities would have to step up and shoulder a large part of the burden.

 

Essential to managing this burden is to have volunteers from the community who would act as mentors and positive role models. We will need a lot of volunteers of all ages. There is no reason at all to disallow a ten-year-old kid from mentoring a five-year-old kid. I see it as becoming a big rush for both kids. The little kid would say, “Wow, a big kid is paying attention to me.” The big kid might say, “Wow, I’m responsible for another person.” I’ll get more into this general idea of using volunteers in another essay. I have a plan for volunteers to be recruited for work in many problem situations.

 

If we do this right, the cycle of abandonment and resultant ignorance will be interrupted. As more of our kids are mentored in a positive way, we will see learning improve and dropout rates decrease. The kids with  hope and models to show them what is possible will try harder. The mean street life will not look so inviting. Education will look like a viable choice. More kids will graduate and more will go on to higher education. The level of ignorance will decrease with a corresponding decrease in crime. The tax base will increase as we produce more and more working people and fewer criminals. Is this a long-term plan? You bet it is. Haven’t you had enough of short-term patch it up fixes yet? Isn’t it time to bite the bullet, hitch up our drawers, and do what’s right for our kids and their future? I think it’s way past time.

 

Concerning schools, more money is not a solution, it’s a copout. Throwing money at a problem without a plan is just crazy. It’s a hack politician’s solution that has never worked. We do need to improve education and there are tools we can use to make that possible. When we look at the facts, we find the schools are overburdened with ridiculous administrative overhead. Too much of this money goes to pay overpaid assistants who are doing what clerks used to do. That takes money away from its primary purpose, which is to pay teachers and pay for the tools of education, plant and equipment.

 

Evidence indicates there is enough money to educate our kids. What is lacking is accountability. Recently the TV show 20/20 aired a one-hour presentation by John Stossel. The name of the show was “Stupid in America.” He made some very good points. A key point was the kids are not stupid. It’s the machine we put them into that is stupid. He had good enough evidence to convince me that schools or choice (AKA vouchers) is a good idea if it is done right. That is a change of position for me. The key here is to make sure the money or voucher is attached to the child and not to a bureaucracy. That would have the effect of forcing the public schools to get efficient or go out of business. We can make laws at the state level to ensure this happens.

 

 There is another issue involved however, that Stossel neatly sidesteps. This is the responsibility of the parents in the equation. Education of kids demands the informed participation of the parents in the educational process. They must get involved and make good choices for their kids. I believe if the parents had actually been doing that this bureaucratic bungling could not have gone on. So we probably need voucher or some kind of plan for giving viable choices to the parents for their kids. We also need informed parental participation to make it work. I will continue with this discussion of education next time.
Back to Steinman for Governor.

Wesoomi Home Page

The Wesoomi Archives

Wesoomi Site Map